Should DB Schemes buy into the case for buy-ins?
Buy-ins can be a useful tool in schemes’ armoury as they de-risk into their endgames, but only under certain conditions.
In this paper we focus on buy-ins, whose key benefit is that they remove all the risks of those members covered by the policy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db640/db64095c2c99b116007c338e2f6350c36f0be99d" alt="Buy-in2.jpg"
As defined benefit (DB) pension schemes mature and become better funded, they are increasingly looking to insurance solutions to help them de-risk. Three common solutions are:
- Buyout: the scheme pays a premium to an insurer, which takes ownership of a portion of the scheme’s assets as well as the liability of being responsible for paying the pensions of the scheme’s insured members
- Buy-in: similar to a buyout, but having been paid a premium by the scheme the insurer makes payments to the scheme, which pays the members in turn. The trustees treat their insurance policy as another asset
- Longevity swap: the scheme transfers the risk of paying for its pensioners living longer than expected to a counterparty in the form of a commitment to exchange payments throughout the term of a swap.
In this paper we focus on buy-ins, whose key benefit is that they remove all the risks of those members covered by the policy. These include investment risk, re-investment risk, rates and inflation risk and longevity risk.
Download full article
Investment capabilities
Our thinking drives our solutions offering, designed for every stage of a pension scheme’s life cycle.
Author(s)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85397/853972b430aaae9c84db31644f48e3ff67a192dc" alt="John Southall"
John Southall
Head of Solutions Research
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e00e2/e00e2ce827109b895be5d469374fb63233683879" alt="Generic author image"